Independent editorial team

Meet the PlinkoNet Team

PlinkoNet is a niche editorial publication focused on one thing: Plinko. We're an independent team of analysts and testers — not a casino, and not owned by one. Every review, RTP figure and casino verdict on this site is produced in-house by the roles below.

We'd rather be honest than complete. When an operator doesn't publish a detail we need — a wagering rule, a payout time, a licence number — we label it “unstated” instead of guessing. That single habit is the difference between a figure you can act on and one that could cost you money.

Our roles

What the team does

Editorial

Editorial & standards

Sets our review methodology, scoring rubric and house style, and signs off every page. Owns the rule that we publish “unstated” rather than invent a number.

Casinos

Casino analysts

Vet operators before we list them: confirm the licence and regulator, check ownership and history, and register, deposit and play to judge the real experience.

Bonuses

Bonus & T&C analysis

Reads the small print so you don't have to: wagering multipliers, max bets, expiry, and game weighting — including that Plinko often contributes 0% toward clearing a bonus.

Payments

Payments & payout testing

Runs real deposits and withdrawals to time actual payout speed, note limits and fees, and flag KYC friction — rather than repeating a marketing “instant”.

Safer play

Responsible-gambling lead

Keeps the 18+ notice and help-resource links on every page, checks that operators offer deposit limits and self-exclusion, and makes sure we never frame Plinko as income.

Accuracy

Data & fact-checking

Cross-checks every RTP, multiplier and claim against the source, logs our own test data, and re-verifies pages so figures stay current instead of drifting out of date.

Every function above is owned by a named editor or reviewer below, and individual analysts are credited by name on the reviews they author. We add named profiles only for real contributors — never placeholder bios.

The people

Our editors & reviewers

The independent iGaming specialists who write, review and sign off the work on PlinkoNet. Each is credited on the pages they produce; links go to their own professional profiles.

Nikita Jones

Editor

South Africa

iGaming writer and editor. Owns editorial standards and final sign-off across PlinkoNet — the methodology, the scoring rubric and the “unstated rather than guess” rule — with editorial work bylined on ReadWrite.

“If an operator won't publish a figure, we won't invent one. ‘Unstated’ beats a number that could cost you money.”

Profile

Charlon Muscat

Lead casino reviewer

Malta

Malta-based iGaming writer covering online casinos and sports betting, with work published on Gambling.com, Techopedia and online-slot.co.uk. Leads our operator vetting — licence, ownership and the real registration-to-payout experience.

“Before a bonus or an RTP figure, I check one thing first — the licence and who really runs the operator. If that doesn't hold up, nothing else matters.”

Portfolio

James Fuller

Senior reviewer — games & casinos

United Kingdom

Freelance iGaming and sports-betting writer with 10+ years covering bookmaker reviews, slots and poker; bylines on ReadWrite and SportsBoom. Handles game reviews and hands-on casino testing.

“I don't trust a headline RTP until I've dropped a few hundred balls myself and watched where they actually land.”

Profile

Dominic Field

Casino & games reviewer

UK / Philippines

iGaming writer covering casinos, slots, sports betting, poker and sweepstakes across English and Tagalog. Focuses on bonus & T&C breakdowns — the wagering, max-bet and game-weighting small print.

“The welcome offer is marketing; the wagering terms are the real deal — and on Plinko that gap is huge, since it often counts 0% toward clearing a bonus.”

Portfolio

Milena Petrovska

Crypto & live-casino specialist

Balkans

iGaming writer with 8 years across live casino, slots and crypto-casino coverage. Leads our crypto-Plinko and provably-fair analysis, plus payments and payout testing on crypto operators.

“With crypto Plinko, ‘provably fair’ isn't a slogan — verify the seed hash yourself, or treat the fairness claim as unproven.”

Website

Contributor links point to their own professional profiles and carry rel="nofollow". Photos and full author pages are added as each contributor is onboarded.

How we work

The short version: hands-on testing, no guessing, and no pay-to-rank. We only list licensed operators, we ground every figure in what the operator actually publishes, and we label anything we can't verify. Sponsored placements are always clearly marked and never change a score. For the full detail — how we test games, how we rate casinos and how our reader-supported model works — see our about & methodology page.

What we stand for

Our values

Accuracy — tested, sourced and re-checked; “unstated” when we don't know

Transparency — independent scoring, links labelled, no pay-to-rank

Player-first — safer play by default; Plinko is entertainment, not income

Explore